[epx666]

mMmmm 4-2 exhaust....

 

[Respect]

pics??????

2003 green ZX 636 R

 

[ldawg]

http://www.renegade-products.com/renegadeusa/messages/16/172.html?1011055242

 

[Respect]

nope, don't like it

2003 green ZX 636 R

 

[DM]

any hp #'s on this exhaust would it flow better? then 4 to 1 i would assume yes any one deal with them before??

Speed is Fun!!

 

[GreenEnvy]

I'd guess one of those 2 is not active, just an empty tube.

inline 4's run better with 4-1 then 4-2, it has to do with the timing of the strokes. V-twins however like the 4-2.

-=Welcome To Canada=-
2002 Green 6R
1986 Gixxer 7/11

 

[Synd]

How does a V-Twin has a 4-2? If it's a Twin, it has two cylinders, so it must be a 2-something exhaust!

I'd bet you wanted to say a 2-1-2, wich is the most usual... <img src=icon_smile_wink.gif border=0 align=middle>

Wilder than the wildest dreams!

 

[GreenEnvy]

You know what I meant. hehe


-=Welcome To Canada=-
2002 Green 6R
1986 Gixxer 7/11

 

[DM]

Sorry i can understand the back pressure being ok for the motor and the extra flow causin harm but why would one of the pipes not be used? 2 header pipes one the other one has 2 the same why should flow very well. but lose low end and mid some what do to the extra cfm flow no or am i wrong???

I have alot time dealin with blown motors and if my knowledge serves me right that setup would yeild a better top end but short it in other areas.

Speed is Fun!!

 

[DM]

But now it is up to the muff and i am not sure if those will flow the cfms needed to cause this effect.

Speed is Fun!!

 

[GreenEnvy]

I read it in a US motorcycle magazine, I'll try to find the article.
I also saw it mentioned in the UK's Superbike magazine..

-=Welcome To Canada=-
2002 Green 6R
1986 Gixxer 7/11