Kawasaki Motorcycle Forums banner

Status
Not open for further replies.
1 - 6 of 6 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
532 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
anybody else read the comparo in the new sport rider for july. the kawi get good marks but come in 4th and 5th of 6. they get good dyno and respectable lap time and good averages but for some reason they come in the bottom.


someone else got any insite?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
7,468 Posts
sounds like a good ol case of advertising money...
 

·
Un-Stealth Administrator
Joined
·
8,215 Posts
A lot of motorcycle/car magazines do that. They're so chock full of bias, it's almost useless to read the comparo's. Car and Driver has this section in their ratings called the "Got to Have It" factor, and there's been several times where another car is obviously a better car, even by points standings, setting it ten or fifteen points above another car, but that other car gets a 25 "got to have it", and the real winning car only gets like a 9, so the lesser car wins by 1 point because of the bias factor. Most of the recent 600 comparo's I've seen were exactly like that. They end up saying, "Yeah, the 636 is faster than all the others, and has more torque than everything except the Triumph. Yeah, it's nimble, and flickable, and very neutral in the corners, much more so than the somewhat nervous R6 and the CBR. The suspension is great in the city and in the canyons, and it's better at almost everything, but in the end, we just don't like it as much." It's rediculous. No one wants to know which bike they like better, they want to know which is the better bike.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
532 Posts
Discussion Starter #6
its just wierd b/c last years winner went to last the cbr. i guess honda must have cut the funds for the writers.
 
1 - 6 of 6 Posts
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top